The Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk is a
high altitude, long endurance (HALE) unmanned aerial system (UAS) designed
primarily for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR)
missions. The UAS utilizes beyond
line-of-sight (BLOS) command, control, and communication (C3) links to enable
operators to control and monitor the aircraft throughout its long ranging
missions. The links also allow for
real-time data feed from the aircraft’s sensors (Northrop Grumman, 2007).
The
Global Hawk has a wingspan of 115 feet, length of 44 feet, height of 15 feet,
and a gross take-off weight 26,750. This
UAS has a range of approximately 12,000 miles, an endurance of approximately 35
hours, and can operate at altitudes up to 65,000 feet (Northrop Grumman,
2007). The Global Hawk is equipped with
a 4 foot Ku wideband satellite antenna for BLOS C3. A Ku-band satellite provides the primary BLOS
C3 relay while an Inmarsat satellite provides a back-up capability. Ultra high frequency (UHF) radio antennas and
a Dual Band Common Data Link (DBCDL) radome antenna provide line-of-sight (LOS)
communication links (Northrop Grumman, 2007).
The ground control station (GCS) for the UAS comprises two separate
elements: A mission control element (MCE) and a launch and recovery element
(LRE). The MCE monitors and controls the
Global Hawk throughout its mission via satellite communications (Satcom) for
BLOS C3. Satcom specialists provide
support for the BLOS C3 operations and equipment. The LRE monitors and controls the aircraft
during its take-offs and landings at its base of operations via LOS C3. UHF radio equipment provide the C3 links for
this element. Communications specialists
provide support for the radio equipment.
The LRE and MCE may or may not be co-located, depending on the mission
requirements (Axe, 2006). Figure 1
displays the BLOS and LOS C3 setup for the Global Hawk.
Figure
1. The BLOS and LOS C3 links and equipment for
the RQ-4 Global Hawk (Barnard, 2007).
A disadvantage of using satcom for BLOS C3
is the requirement for satellites to relay the signals. The expense of building, launching, and
operating satellites can be significant.
The specialized personnel and terminals required for a satcom system
will also incur additional expense and increase the logistical footprint of the
GCS (Poole, n.d.). Another disadvantage
is the latency in the signal traveling across the vast distances between the
GCS, satellite, and UAS. A significant
degree of delay, availability, and continuity in communications could
potentially make a UAS operating BLOS with satcom C3 unable to meet
international civil aviation requirements (Mettrop, 2011, p. 5). Transitioning a Global Hawk from BLOS to LOS
control also requires careful coordination between the MCE and LRE to ensure
smooth operations. If the two elements
are not co-located, clear and reliable communications are extremely
important. Personnel cannot simply walk
over to coordinate with the other element in this scenario if communications
are impaired or lost.
An advantage of the Global Hawk using
satcom BLOS is the range at which the links can be maintained. To increase the “radio horizon” to maintain
LOS, the height of the GCS antenna and altitude of the UAS must increase. LOS links must also be clear of any
structures or objects that may obstruct the LOS (FAB Corp, 2016). LOS C3 systems also require establishment of
ground infrastructure at different locations to provide links. Satcom system ground stations do not need to
be in a given location due to the wide coverage and long range of satcom
systems. The lack of requirement for
extensive ground infrastructure also means satcom systems can be more rapidly
deployed and to more remote locations (Poole, n.d.).
Military ISR
missions, such those carried out by Global Hawk, are not the only application
of BLOS C3 systems. A civilian UAS could
also benefit from this technology. A
civilian HALE UAS providing communications relay or wireless internet would
most likely be operated BLOS from a GCS.
A scientific UAS performing high altitude atmosphere research or
surveying a remote region would also benefit from satcom links. The BLOS C3 links provided by satcom systems
would allow civilian commercial and scientific UAS to operate virtually
anywhere in the world without the need to establish the C3 ground
infrastructure in a particular region.References:
Axe,
D. (2006, August 6). Inside Global Hawk. DefenseTech. Retrieved from
http://www.defensetech.org/2006/08/06/inside-global-hawk/
Barnard,
J. (2007, December). Small UAV Command, Control, and Communication
Issues.
Presentation from
Institute of Engineering and Technology seminar, London, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.barnardmicrosystems.com/media/
presentations/IET_UAV_C2_Barnard_DEC_2007.pdf
Fleeman,
Anderson, & Bird Corporation.
(2016). Understanding Radio Line of Sight [Fact
Sheet]. Retrieved from http://www.fab-corp.com/pages.php?pageid=2
Mettrop,
J. (2011, March). Unmanned Aircraft Systems – Availability,
Continuity and Latency.
Working paper from the 23rd
meeting of Working Group F of the International Civil Aviation Organization,
Paris, France. Retrieved from www.icao.int%2Fsafety%2Facp%2Facpwgf%2Facp-wg-f-24%2Facp-wgf24-wp15%2520uas%2520rcp.doc&usg=AFQjCNFzFDtKVZLhtuzvnvyXA_pLV4XB5Q&cad=rja
Northrop
Grumman. (2007). RQ-4
Global Hawk Maritime Demonstration System [Fact Sheet].
Retrieved from http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/RQ4Block10GlobalHawk/
Documents/GHMD-New-Brochure.pdf
Poole,
I. (n.d.). Satellite Communications Basics
Tutorial. Radio-Electronics.com.
Retrieved
from http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/satellite/communications_satellite/satellite-communications-basics-tutorial.phpDC:
U.S. Government Printing Office.
No comments:
Post a Comment