Saturday, November 28, 2015

UNSY 605, Assignment 6.4, Control Station Analysis



A method of control for an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) is a first-person view (FPV) system.  This control system allows operators to “see” from the point of view of the vehicle.  FPV control systems are useful in beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) operations, particularly in confined spaces or cluttered areas.  However, potential issues with field of view (FOV) and command, control, and communication (C3) links must be addressed with this type of control system.
            The Inspector Bots Trackbot UGV utilizes FPV in its control system.  The Trackbot is a lightweight, highly portable system (Inspector Bots, 2014).  The vehicle weighs only 10 pounds and can be transported in a single hard case.  The UGV features rubber, caterpillar-type tracks that allow the vehicle to travel over uneven terrain, obstructions, slick surfaces such as snow, inclines of up to 45 degrees, and allows it to turn 360 degrees within the space of its own footprint.  The chassis of the vehicle is also water resistant and the battery compartment provides easy access to swap batteries for continued operation.  The Trackbot’s compact design allows the UGV to enter confined spaces such as pipes, underneath vehicles, crawlspaces, and caverns.  Headlights and upgradeable infrared cameras also provide capability for low light operations (“Trackbot”, 2012).
            The control system of the Trackbot consists of a hand held control unit, transmitter, receiver, and video screen.  All control system hard/software fits into a portable hard case.  Figure 1 displays the Trackbot’s control system setup.

Figure 1.  The Trackbot’s portable control unit within its transporter case.
The video screen provides the view from the Trackbot’s on-board wide field-of-view (FOV) camera.  The Trackbot can be operated line-of-sight (LOS) using the hand held control unit.  The FPV screen is utilized for operations in which the Trackbot turns a corner in a structure or enters a confined space that prevents LOS to the operator.  The wide FOV afforded by the UGV’s camera allows the operator excellent situational awareness (“Trackbot”, 2012).
The Trackbot’s FPV system is also upgradeable to virtual reality (VR) goggle use (Inspector Bots, 2014).  The VR goggles would provide a view to the operator similar to operators of FPV racing drones.  Stock (2015) writes that FPV drone racer, Matt Denham, states that VR goggles provide an “entirely new dimension with your surroundings” and “it’s as close to being a bird as you can get”.  VR goggles would provide an immersive environment to allow a Trackbot user to operate the UGV as if he/she were the vehicle itself.  An additional improvement to the FPV system would be to utilize a motorized, gimbaled camera on the UGV.  A headset with integrated sensors would sense the orientation of the operator’s head.  Control software would link the UGV’s camera and the operator’s headset to allow the operator to look 360 degrees around the vehicle.  This improvement would provide exponentially improved situational awareness for the operator.  The immersive environment would provide benefits similar to the immersive full flight simulators used to train commercial airline pilots (AAG Staff, 2015).          
            The Trackbot’s control system utilizes a powerful transmitter and receiver to maintain C3 link between the vehicle and operator.  However, radio frequency interference can disrupt the C3 link and, potentially, control of the vehicle.  A variety of electronic equipment nearby, such as wireless/cell phones, radio towers, wi-fi routers, and power lines, can interfere with the C3 link (Derene, 2011).  This could be a particular problem with operating a Trackbot in an urban environment.  Proper bandwidth management and transmitter/receiver power would be needed to maintain the integrity of the link.  The improvement of a gimbaled camera on the UGV and linked operator headset would also require a robust C3 link and sufficient bandwidth.  These concerns would be critical to ensuring the view provided to the operator is seamless and smooth to prevent disorienting and motion-sickness inducing jerkiness.

References:
  
Alpha Aviation Group Staff.  (2015, October 30).  How AAG’s Level D Airbus A320 Full Flight Simulator Delivers Top Quality Training.  Alpha Aviation Group News and Updates.  Retrieved from http://aag.aero/how-aags-level-d-airbus-a320-full-flight-simulator-delivers-top-quality-training/


Derene, G.  (2014, March 10).  How to Fight RF Interference with Your Gadgets.  PopularMechanics.  Retrieved from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/how-to/a11792/how-to-fight-rf-interference-with-your-gadgets/

Inspector Bots.  (2014).  The Trackbot [Fact Sheet].  Retrieved from http://www.inspectorbots.com/Trackbot.html

Stock, D.  (2015, August 16).  The New, Underground Sport of First-Person Drone Racing.  ArsTechnica.  Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/08/the-new-underground-sport-of-first-person-drone-racing/

Trackbot Tracked Robot Robotic Platform [Video File].  Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZP90aOvJ5w 

No comments:

Post a Comment