George
Santayana (2005, Vol. 1, Chap. 12, para. 19) stated “Those who cannot remember
the past are condemned to repeat it”.
This lesson is easily applied to the case analysis tool. Many of the physical science and engineering
disciplines are applied in unmanned aerial systems (UAS). Science and engineering both make extensive
use of experimentation and case studies.
The aviation field, in general, also employs case studies on a frequent
basis. One example is the use of
National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) accident reports.
The
case analysis tool is extremely valuable to the decision making process. Historical cases provide examples with which
to extrapolate future outcomes. One
example is Napoleon Bonaparte’s 1812 invasion of Russia. Although the campaign appeared to be an
assuring string of successes, the ultimate outcome was a crushing blow that
contributed significantly to Napoleon’s fall from power. 129 years later, Adolf Hitler ordered the
launch of Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. Although warfare techniques and technology
had made significant advances in the intervening years, many of the same
factors that contributed to Napoleon’s defeat would also plague Hitler’s
Wehrmacht. The Fuhrer’s failure to learn
from Napoleon’s mistakes would eventually contribute significantly to his
downfall as well (Betts, 2013).
In
the field of UAS, much like the manned aviation fields, the case analysis tool is
a valuable resource. Examination of
historical cases involving unmanned and manned aircraft will provide valuable
data points by which to make decisions. Analyses
of successes can provide direction in what will work and what a development
team will consider emulating.
Conversely, analyses of failures can provide direction in what will not
work and what not to do. One who is aspiring
for a future in UAS will need to understand and apply case analysis tools
properly. As mentioned earlier, the UAS
field incorporates much of the physical science and engineering
disciplines. Both fields incorporate experimentation
and testing. Examination of past experiments
and tests can provide a ready source of lessons learned and save time for
development teams by not needing to “re-invent the wheel”.
References:
Betts, M. (2013, September 13). Hitler and Napoleon. In Michael’s
RCL Blog. Retrieved from http://sites.psu.edu/rclmichaelxb/2013/09/13/week-1-hitler-and-napoleon/
Santayana, G. (2005).
The Life of Reason, Volumes One
through Five. New York: Dover
Publications, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment